Partnership
Course Mapping & Validation
We support providers who offer training and/or qualifications in Leadership and/or Equity Diversity & Inclusion
The aim of our course mapping & validation service is to support providers who offer training and/or qualifications in (i) Leadership and/or (ii) Equity Diversity & Inclusion which does not lead to a defined exit award or qualification.
A course mapping and validation service is a structured, multi-step process to ensure a qualification from one system is recognised and accepted within another.
Our course mapping and validation service is only available to training providers.
We do not offer mapping to our MBA programme.
Course Mapping Process
The mapping phase focuses on comparing the core components of two different qualifications to establish a preliminary equivalence. It requires a detailed comparison of (i) curriculum content, (ii) learning outcomes, and (iii) assessment methods.
Step 1: Pre-submission discussion
Initial exploration: The provider makes a request for meeting to engage in a qualification mapping and validation exercise.
Mapping & validation: The provider and the IEUC agree process, terms and timelines.
Step 2: Comparative analysis
Curriculum analysis: A subject-matter expert analyses the provider’s course modules and content to find direct or comparable matches with the reference qualification’s curriculum.
Learning outcomes assessment: The IEUC compares the expected learning outcomes of both qualifications. This goes beyond just module titles to ensure the skills and competencies achieved are equivalent.
Assessment methodology: The assessment types (e.g., exams, practical work, workplace assessments, projects) and standards are compared to see if they align with the rigour and requirements of the IEUC’s qualification.
Credit and level analysis: Based on the above, a determination is made regarding the alignment of the (i) academic level and (ii) credit value of the provider’s qualification.
Step 3: Mapping outcome
Equivalency report: A detailed report is produced for the training provider, confirming a qualification is or isn’t a match.
If the comparison confirms the qualifications are a direct and fair match, the next step is to move to the validation phase. If a qualification is not considered a direct match, specific recommendations/ suggestions will be provided.
Course Validation Process
If the initial mapping process reveals that a provider’s qualification is equivalent to a specific IEUC qualification, the following steps will follow:
Step 1: Quality Review and Approval
Quality Assurance Committee review: A panel of experts including internal staff reviews the equivalency report and verification evidence. If necessary, external advisors and employer representatives might also be invited or consulted.
Approval: Following approval by the QAC, a Certificate of Equivalency or a Statement of Comparability, confirming that a provider’s qualification is valid and equivalent to a specified IEUC qualification.
Non-Equivalent
If the initial mapping process reveals that a provider’s qualification is not believed to be sufficiently aligned, the IEUC will provide recommendations / suggestions to bridge identified gaps.
Step 1: Detailed gap analysis report
Explain the non-equivalency: The IEUC submits to the provider a detailed report explaining exactly where and why their qualification does not meet the criteria for equivalency.
This could highlight deficiencies in:
Content: Specific modules or subject areas that are missing.
Competency: Practical skills or workplace experience that has not been adequately assessed.
Level and credit: An overall shortfall in the academic level or scope of the qualification.
Feedback session: An appropriate IEUC staff will debrief the provider and discuss potential options.
Step 2: Compensatory measures
Prescribed additional learning: For minor gaps, the IEUC may recommend specific, focused “compensatory measures” to achieve equivalency.
These may include:
Completing specific modules or units from an IEUC reference qualification.
Undertaking an additional assessment to prove a specific competency.
Completing a specified period of supervised practice or placement or activity.
Alternative pathway plan: For more significant gaps, the IEUC may advise the provider to pursue a different, less direct route, such as enrolling in a condensed or bridging course.
For more information,